#SFN10 Day 3 – Inhibiting mossy fiber output and PPP of course!Jason Snyder | 11/16/2010
Yesterday morning I checked out the technically-heroic dissection of mossy fiber function from the Tonegawa lab that employed a quadruple transgenic mouse: Mossy fiber input for pattern separation and pattern completion
*T. NAKASHIBA1, J. CUSHMAN2, K. A. PELKEY3, C. J. MCBAIN3, M. S. FANSELOW2, S. TONEGAWA1;
1The RIKEN-MIT Ctr. For Neural Circuit Genetics, The Picower Inst. For Lear, CAMBRIDGE, MA; 2Dept. of Psychology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; 3NICHD, NIH, Bethesda, MD
Using POMC-Cre to drive expression of tetanus toxin in dentate granule neurons the authors were able to inhibit synaptic transmission in the mossy fiber output of the dentate gyrus and investigate its role in pattern separation (defined behaviorally as the ability to distinguish fine spatial/sensory details) and pattern completion (ability to recreate a fully memory from partial cues). Interestingly, the transgenic model did not block transmission in new neurons aged 4-6 weeks-old and younger. This was demonstrated with a viral strategy, where newborn granule neurons were made to express both mCherry-VAMP2 and synaptophysin-GFP. Examining puncta in mossy fiber boutons it was clear that immature neurons had both red- and green-labeled boutons and that, with age, tetanus toxin degraded the fluorescently-labeled VAMP leaving only green boutons (the immunohistochemistry images were beautiful in this poster by the way).
So, with the model established, they went on to perform discriminative contextual fear conditioning as a test of pattern separation: mice were required to learn that one context predicted shock and another context did not. Surprisingly, given the often-cited role of the dentate gyrus in pattern separation and context discrimination, mice lacking mossy fiber transmission were better at this task. The pattern completion task was also contextual fear conditioning-based but used the immediate shock deficit (aka context pre-exposure facilitation effect) paradigm. Here, mice failed to learn to fear a context paired with shock if they spend only short amount of time in the context (here it was 10s I believe). However, pre-exposing the mice to the context several weeks earlier enabled control mice to learn despite the brief training experience (i.e. training/shocking with only brief cue exposure, they were able to “pattern complete” and retrieve the full memory of the context). But the mice lacking mossy fiber transmission were impaired at this task.
What the heck does this mean? Well, one possibility is that mature granule neurons/mossy fibers impair behavioral pattern separation and, upon inhibiting them, a pattern separation function of immature neurons is uncovered. This is a bit of a stretch I think. I wonder whether such a population of immature neurons (4 week-old neurons are just becoming functional) could have a significant impact. But it’s possible and would be fascinating to test whether eliminating this additional population would change the behavioral phenotype. These findings also seem at odds with previous studies from the same group showing that NMDAR dysfunction in the dentate gyrus leads to impaired context discrimination rather than the improved context discrimination observed here. Then again, blocking NMDARs is a completely different type of lesion than blocking an entire output pathway…in any case, I think we can agree – great food for thought.
And now time for PPP!
Maybe I have no idea what’s interesting or important. To obviate this potential problem, here are Photos of Popular Posters. What everyone else found interesting. In the MMM/LLL area…
A computational model of the role of orbitofrontal cortex and ventral striatum in signalling reward expectancy in reinforcement learning. I walked by this poster twice – each walk separated by about and hour and both times PACKED! You will notice the high degree of chin-touching in the audience – an additional measure of popularity that I will include in SFN2011’s reporting (once I get the method down).
The human substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area compute experiential and fictive error learning signals. Congrats – big crowd especially considering that, as far as I know, there’s not even adult neurogenesis in these brain regions!